Electricity 2.0 talk at ETech

by Tom Raftery on April 22, 2009 · 10 comments

in demand response, video

I gave a talk at the O’Reilly Emerging Technology Conference (ETech) in San Jose earlier this year. The title of the talk was Electricity 2.0 – applying the lessons of the Internet to our Energy networks. I uploaded my slides to SlideShare shortly after the talk and yesterday I was contacted by the O’Reilly team to let me know the video of my presentation was online so here you go.

It is similar to other Electricity 2.0 talks I have given with a few updates and new slides. Enjoy!

by-sa
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

{ 3 trackbacks }

Earth Day: Who’s influencing green tech and clean tech decisions | Sway
April 22, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Interesting tidbit in Tom Raftery’s Ele… « Paul M. Watson
April 23, 2009 at 11:58 am
HomeCamp 2 « dale lane
May 20, 2009 at 1:15 pm

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1 indarki April 23, 2009 at 9:18 am

> 95% are interested in receiving detailed information on their energy use

Yeap, but, how many of them would pay for it?
To change the meter and to introduce an IT system that can monitorize your consumption isn’t free.

And don’t expect Utility will do. Maybe the meter, in order to have the energy consumption continously up to date.

I think the cost of deploying this kind of technology is one of the big problems to solve.

2 simon April 24, 2009 at 5:04 pm

Hi I have to say i enjoyed the talk

3 Sean Dunleavy June 12, 2009 at 11:35 pm

Hi Tom, really enjoy your work. In the talk you make reference to, I think, ‘exotic storage solutions’. I’m just wondering if you have come across the ‘Spirit of Ireland’ group and their proposals for pumped seawater storage in the west of Ireland and, if you have, would you believe that their proposals are workable?
http://www.spiritofireland.org

4 Tom Raftery June 16, 2009 at 7:40 am

Sean,

I have had the briefest of looks at the Spirit of Ireland ideas and they seem very ambitious. The Turlough Hill pumped hydro station ws built between 1968-73 at a cost then of £20m and stores 280mWh.

To store excess from wind today you’d need 8x what Turlough Hill can store. This would cost billions and take years to get through the planning stages at all. However, if they can pull it off, fair dues to them!

5 Sean Dunleavy June 16, 2009 at 11:55 am

Tom, might I respectfully suggest that you give a closer look at the proposal, the comparison with Turlogh Hill and other pumped storage solutions is not applicable. If you get a chance, have a look at this presentation given at IIEA last Thursday week, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWl2TuHcY6w.

6 Joe Short July 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm

Hi Tom, Fantastic first 5 minutes — then the video seems to stop! Any way of getting at the rest of your talk?

7 Tom Raftery July 16, 2009 at 4:06 pm

Joe,

I just switched the video embed to a copy on YouTube – it should work better now.

If you are still having problems let me know.

Thanks.

Leave a Comment

Additional comments powered by BackType

Previous post:

Next post: