post

What If We Create a Better World For Nothing?

091207usatoday global warming.91
One of my goals in 2010 is to help move the sustainability debate beyond Global Warming. Global Warming or Climate Change is still arguable – while other environmental impacts and issues are not. Its surely time for sustainability advocates to reframe our narrative – and get beyond the Global Warming debate. We might as well try and convince evangelicals of evolution… instead we need to start focusing on immediate and real issues- such as a lack of potable water in many geographies. Energy independence is perhaps the best argument for renewal energy. People are generally more worried about national security than the potentials threats of global warming.

Of course some really major climate events may change the game, but for now, we should focus on the changes we can make in terms of business, culture and politics. You can understand why I love this cartoon from USA Today, which sums my thoughts up beautifully.

post

Greenpeace score big wins against illegal deforestation in Brazil

Deforestation in the Amazon to make way for cattle

Photo credit leoffreitas

GreenPeace released a damning report last month called Slaughtering the Amazon in which it detailed how the Brazilian cattle sector is the largest driver of deforestation in the world.

In this shocking exposé Greenpeace detailed how:

  • Cattle are responsible for about 80% of all deforestation’ in the Amazon region. In recent years, on average one hectare of Amazon rainforest has been lost to cattle ranchers every 18 seconds.
  • Analysis by Greenpeace of 2006–2007 satellite data and forest clearance permits reveals that more than 90% of current Amazon deforestation was illegal.
  • The Brazilian government has invested in many of the large beef producing companies.
  • Greenpeace identified hundreds of ranches within the Amazon rainforest supplying cattle to slaughterhouses in the Amazon region belonging to Bertin, JBS and Marfrig

The report goes on to name many well known brands who are buying the products of this illegal deforestation (often unwittingly) – names such as Unilever, Colgate Palmolive, Johnson & Johnson, Nike, Reebok, Addidas, Boss, Geox, Gucci, Hilfiger, Louis Vuitton and Prada, amongst a long list of other extremely recognisable names.

Then comes news this week that:

Responding to allegations that major Brazilian cattle producers are responsible for illegal forest clearing in the Amazon, Brazil’s development bank BNDES will soon require processors to trace the origin of beef back to the ranch where it was produced in order to qualify for loans

Furthermore, as a result of the report:

Brazil’s three largest supermarket chains, Wal-Mart, Carrefour and Pão de Açúcar, last week announced they would suspend contracts with suppliers found to be involved in Amazon deforestation, while Bertin, the world’s largest beef processor, saw its $90 million loan from the International Finance Corporation withdrawn. Marfrig, the world’s fourth largest beef trader and one of the firms named in the report, said last week it will no longer buy cattle raised in newly deforested areas within the Brazilian Amazon. Meanwhile a Brazilian federal prosecutor has filed a billion dollar law suit against the cattle industry for environmental damage. Firms that market tainted meat may be subject to fines of 500 reais ($260) per kilo.

This is a spectacular win for Greenpeace, the Amazonian Rainforest, and all of us who depend on it for life on our planet.

It is not over yet. The traceability program depends on ear tags which are removable and so can be gamed. True traceability would use chips and would be independently verified. Still, this is a big step in the right direction and massive kudos are due to Greenpeace for this win.