<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will airlines start weighing their passengers (and charge accordingly)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenmonk.net/index.php/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/</link>
	<description>Green from the roots up, Sustainable from the top down</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3390</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3390</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

Once again it seems that you've predicted a trend, though it seems that Air India may be masking fuel savings with the "saftey hazard" moniker:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7439894.stm

 -Blake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>Once again it seems that you&#8217;ve predicted a trend, though it seems that Air India may be masking fuel savings with the &#8220;saftey hazard&#8221; moniker:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7439894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7439894.stm</a></p>
<p> -Blake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolai Rygh</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3327</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolai Rygh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3327</guid>
		<description>My trackback to your post doesn't work... but anyway - here it is:
http://rygh.no/?blog=475

I would say in short. I don't think it is politically incorrect. Or it shouldn't be ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trackback to your post doesn&#8217;t work&#8230; but anyway - here it is:<br />
<a href="http://rygh.no/?blog=475" rel="nofollow">http://rygh.no/?blog=475</a></p>
<p>I would say in short. I don&#8217;t think it is politically incorrect. Or it shouldn&#8217;t be <img src='http://greenmonk.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RYGHDOTNO</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>RYGHDOTNO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Charge passengers based on weight...&lt;/strong&gt;

In this high oil price marked, the airliners try everything to offset the higher prices of fuel. Charging more for extra luggage is one way, but as Tom at Greenmork writes in his post......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Charge passengers based on weight&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In this high oil price marked, the airliners try everything to offset the higher prices of fuel. Charging more for extra luggage is one way, but as Tom at Greenmork writes in his post&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregory</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>the courage of the business mind is pathetic...

example, all the hidden costs added onto the air ticket fare...

just have the guts to raise the price, quit the nickel-dime stuff.  it increases transparency, shows the true cost, helps me keep my respect for you ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the courage of the business mind is pathetic&#8230;</p>
<p>example, all the hidden costs added onto the air ticket fare&#8230;</p>
<p>just have the guts to raise the price, quit the nickel-dime stuff.  it increases transparency, shows the true cost, helps me keep my respect for you &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Menti</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Menti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3313</guid>
		<description>At  least in "green" terms, isn't this a red herring? I weigh 95 kg, but surely the difference in fuel consumption to an airline if I lost 10 kg or so would be measurable only in pennies, not in pounds (or euros) even given high oil prices, and would only make a neglibile difference to carbon output.

The real answer is to fly less. Use alternative modes of transport, and if that's not realistic, use technology (and there's a lot of that, as I'm sure you'll know) to avoid having to travel in person. Yes, airlines will try and squeeze the last penny out of travellers, but please don't let them dress this up as some sort of green issue - they are diagonally opposed to any ecological progress by definition. 

I see a lot of internet A-Listers fly all over the place all the time, and at the same time beat their breast about global warming and ecological issues - but I remain to be convinced that these people really need to travel (despite what they may claim) any more than the budget-airline holiday makers they so despise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At  least in &#8220;green&#8221; terms, isn&#8217;t this a red herring? I weigh 95 kg, but surely the difference in fuel consumption to an airline if I lost 10 kg or so would be measurable only in pennies, not in pounds (or euros) even given high oil prices, and would only make a neglibile difference to carbon output.</p>
<p>The real answer is to fly less. Use alternative modes of transport, and if that&#8217;s not realistic, use technology (and there&#8217;s a lot of that, as I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll know) to avoid having to travel in person. Yes, airlines will try and squeeze the last penny out of travellers, but please don&#8217;t let them dress this up as some sort of green issue - they are diagonally opposed to any ecological progress by definition. </p>
<p>I see a lot of internet A-Listers fly all over the place all the time, and at the same time beat their breast about global warming and ecological issues - but I remain to be convinced that these people really need to travel (despite what they may claim) any more than the budget-airline holiday makers they so despise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>Southwest does charge more for large passengers ("customers of size"), by requiring them to purchase two seats.  The justification is comfort, rather than fuel use, but it's the closest I know  to what you're talking about that's actually in operation (http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/cos_guidelines.html).  Other airlines may have similar policies, but Southwest got the most press about theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Southwest does charge more for large passengers (&#8221;customers of size&#8221;), by requiring them to purchase two seats.  The justification is comfort, rather than fuel use, but it&#8217;s the closest I know  to what you&#8217;re talking about that&#8217;s actually in operation (http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/cos_guidelines.html).  Other airlines may have similar policies, but Southwest got the most press about theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Watson</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/will-airlines-start-weighing-their-passengers-and-charge-accordingly/#comment-3308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=165#comment-3308</guid>
		<description>This makes you stop and think.  Hard.  I don't think this is politically incorrect.  There is massive focus on the health aspects associated with weight by most governments including consumption taxes in order to offset healthcare costs, and mathematically there is only a simple x/y (total weight / cost of oil) x profit factor involved in any transportation, shipping or baggage fee structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes you stop and think.  Hard.  I don&#8217;t think this is politically incorrect.  There is massive focus on the health aspects associated with weight by most governments including consumption taxes in order to offset healthcare costs, and mathematically there is only a simple x/y (total weight / cost of oil) x profit factor involved in any transportation, shipping or baggage fee structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
