<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Times and the Google non-story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenmonk.net/sunday-times-and-the-google-non-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenmonk.net/sunday-times-and-the-google-non-story/</link>
	<description>Green from the roots up, Sustainable from the top down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/sunday-times-and-the-google-non-story/comment-page-1/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=767#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Tom - a bit of top-level analysis I did on my blog using kWh, which are less, umm, &quot;flexible&quot; than CO&quot; grams. The Times article gives Google the energy needs of a 500,000 person city, the Google figures give the energy needs of a village.

Google&#039;s infrastructure is far closer in scale to that required by a moderate sized city than a village. So, if not search, something is eating up all the power.

(See here http://broadstuff.com/archives/1494-Google-searching-not-eco-friendly.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; a bit of top-level analysis I did on my blog using kWh, which are less, umm, &#8220;flexible&#8221; than CO&#8221; grams. The Times article gives Google the energy needs of a 500,000 person city, the Google figures give the energy needs of a village.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s infrastructure is far closer in scale to that required by a moderate sized city than a village. So, if not search, something is eating up all the power.</p>
<p>(See here <a href="http://broadstuff.com/archives/1494-Google-searching-not-eco-friendly.html)" rel="nofollow">http://broadstuff.com/archives/1494-Google-searching-not-eco-friendly.html)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; How Green is The Cloud?</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/sunday-times-and-the-google-non-story/comment-page-1/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; How Green is The Cloud?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=767#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>[...] sure he correlated the question with this slightly bizarre incident he also wrote up, in which Google rebuts a claim about how energy intensive it is. Plausible denial against academic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sure he correlated the question with this slightly bizarre incident he also wrote up, in which Google rebuts a claim about how energy intensive it is. Plausible denial against academic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
