<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/</link>
	<description>Green from the roots up, Sustainable from the top down</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: monkchips</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-4/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>monkchips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>nice catch aron and shaddi... its hard enough explaining the peak load, but energy clearly != electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice catch aron and shaddi&#8230; its hard enough explaining the peak load, but energy clearly != electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aron Roberts</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-4/#comment-8560</link>
		<dc:creator>Aron Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8560</guid>
		<description>Shaddi writes: &quot;The linked article is a bit ambiguous, but remember that electricity is a subset of a countryâ€™s total energy needs.&quot;

True.

Is it possible that there is some confusion introduced, in this blog post, between Spain&#039;s electricity requirements and total energy requirements?

The end of the first sentence, &quot;Spain set a new record, hitting 53.7% of its energy requirements being supplied by wind energy,&quot; refers to total energy requirements, but the second sentence, which refers to &quot;the amount of electricity being supplied by wind,&quot; refers only to electrical energy.

Even if at the relatively short-lived, peak moment or period cited, 53.7% of Spain&#039;s *electricity* requirements were supplied by wind energy, that is still an impressive total, but that&#039;s a manifestly different assertion than stating that wind supplied 53.7% of Spain&#039;s *energy* requirements.

At least in the USA - I&#039;m not sure how applicable this may be to Spain - electricity consumption is an important but minority fraction of total energy consumption; one handy overview can be found at:

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
&quot;Energy Goes With the Flow&quot;
Science &amp; Technology Review, September 2009
https://str.llnl.gov/Sep09/simon.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaddi writes: &#8220;The linked article is a bit ambiguous, but remember that electricity is a subset of a countryâ€™s total energy needs.&#8221;</p>
<p>True.</p>
<p>Is it possible that there is some confusion introduced, in this blog post, between Spain&#8217;s electricity requirements and total energy requirements?</p>
<p>The end of the first sentence, &#8220;Spain set a new record, hitting 53.7% of its energy requirements being supplied by wind energy,&#8221; refers to total energy requirements, but the second sentence, which refers to &#8220;the amount of electricity being supplied by wind,&#8221; refers only to electrical energy.</p>
<p>Even if at the relatively short-lived, peak moment or period cited, 53.7% of Spain&#8217;s *electricity* requirements were supplied by wind energy, that is still an impressive total, but that&#8217;s a manifestly different assertion than stating that wind supplied 53.7% of Spain&#8217;s *energy* requirements.</p>
<p>At least in the USA &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure how applicable this may be to Spain &#8211; electricity consumption is an important but minority fraction of total energy consumption; one handy overview can be found at:</p>
<p>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories<br />
&#8220;Energy Goes With the Flow&#8221;<br />
Science &amp; Technology Review, September 2009<br />
<a href="https://str.llnl.gov/Sep09/simon.html" rel="nofollow">https://str.llnl.gov/Sep09/simon.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind! â€” GreenMonk: the blog</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-4/#comment-8276</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind! â€” GreenMonk: the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8276</guid>
		<description>[...] via Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind! â€” GreenMonk: the blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind! â€” GreenMonk: the blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick M.</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-3/#comment-8148</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8148</guid>
		<description>Very misleading headline!&quot;Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind ..... for a few nano-seconds!&quot;

What percent of energy over the past YEAR was generated by wind? - that is more relevant and important.  Looking at what happened at 5:30am one morning  is meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very misleading headline!&#8221;Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind &#8230;.. for a few nano-seconds!&#8221;</p>
<p>What percent of energy over the past YEAR was generated by wind? &#8211; that is more relevant and important.  Looking at what happened at 5:30am one morning  is meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christians dagbok &#8211; 2009-11-14 &#124; En sur karamell</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-2/#comment-8130</link>
		<dc:creator>Christians dagbok &#8211; 2009-11-14 &#124; En sur karamell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8130</guid>
		<description>[...] Shared Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind*. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shared Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind*. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Reading Assignment &#171; laurence turner</title>
		<link>http://greenmonk.net/spain-gets-53-of-its-energy-from-wind/comment-page-2/#comment-8088</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Reading Assignment &#171; laurence turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenmonk.net/?p=1658#comment-8088</guid>
		<description>[...] wind in the sails of the Green Movement? Perhaps&#8230; Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind!, greenmonk.net / Sarah Palin Suggests Coin Conspiracy In Wisconsin Speech, huffingtonpost.com / [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wind in the sails of the Green Movement? Perhaps&#8230; Spain gets 53% of its energy from wind!, greenmonk.net / Sarah Palin Suggests Coin Conspiracy In Wisconsin Speech, huffingtonpost.com / [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
