http://greenmonk.net/on-clover-choked-new-zealand-christine-keeler-and-food-miles/ Green from the roots up, Sustainable from the top down Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:01:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://greenmonk.net/on-clover-choked-new-zealand-christine-keeler-and-food-miles/#comment-3330 Stephen Llewellyn Mon, 26 May 2008 19:54:29 +0000 http://greenmonk.net/?p=29#comment-3330 Also..it wasn't Christine Keeler who said it. It was Mandy Rice-Davis. And the proper quotation is "He would say that, wouldn't he?" Also..it wasn’t Christine Keeler who said it. It was Mandy Rice-Davis. And the proper quotation is “He would say that, wouldn’t he?”

]]> http://greenmonk.net/on-clover-choked-new-zealand-christine-keeler-and-food-miles/#comment-3287 Greenmonk Associates : The Wrong People Are Getting The Bill Thu, 22 May 2008 08:38:08 +0000 http://greenmonk.net/?p=29#comment-3287 [...] believer in food miles and local sourcing there is a New Zealand meat farmer that will argue NZ is a better source of eco-friendly meat because it doesn’t use petrochemical fertilizer on fields sheep graze. Yesterday morning [...] [...] believer in food miles and local sourcing there is a New Zealand meat farmer that will argue NZ is a better source of eco-friendly meat because it doesn’t use petrochemical fertilizer on fields sheep graze. Yesterday morning [...]

]]> http://greenmonk.net/on-clover-choked-new-zealand-christine-keeler-and-food-miles/#comment-250 monkchips Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:27:05 +0000 http://greenmonk.net/?p=29#comment-250 That's probably fair Mike. It was really intended as a throwaway rather than deep analysis. Nice reason to use the infamous Christine Keeler pictures though. I better go dig into the original study. That’s probably fair Mike. It was really intended as a throwaway rather than deep analysis. Nice reason to use the infamous Christine Keeler pictures though. I better go dig into the original study.

]]> http://greenmonk.net/on-clover-choked-new-zealand-christine-keeler-and-food-miles/#comment-247 Mike Gunderloy Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:44:02 +0000 http://greenmonk.net/?p=29#comment-247 Oh come now James - this is not up to your usual standard of analysis. Just because the conclusion of the study is convenient to the locale where it was done does not make it wrong, you know. Feel free to argue that there are other reasons besides fossil fuel consumption why local food production is a good thing. Feel free to track down the actual study and demonstrate flawed methodology. But as it stands I see no real basis beyond faith for your distrust in the original study. Oh come now James - this is not up to your usual standard of analysis. Just because the conclusion of the study is convenient to the locale where it was done does not make it wrong, you know. Feel free to argue that there are other reasons besides fossil fuel consumption why local food production is a good thing. Feel free to track down the actual study and demonstrate flawed methodology. But as it stands I see no real basis beyond faith for your distrust in the original study.

]]>