Greenmonk: the blog

Very interesting idea here from Sky TV in the UK. They are getting customers to vote for which charities they should support. The charities have created videos about their efforts, which you can then vote for. This is the second cool green thing I have seen Sky involved in in as many weeks. Sky is the UK’s name for FOX, in case you didn’t know. I have a favourite charity choice already - Global Action Plan, which I wrote about here. Disclosure: I am going to be doing some pro-bono work with Global Action Plan on community engagement work.

But please watch the videos and make up your own minds.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

I just got back from Microsoft TechEd IT Forum 2007 in Barcelona. The company’s new strategy seems to be… if it moves virtualise it, if it doesn’t move virtualise it anyway, and if its virtualised already then virtualise it some more and manage it. Microsoft is determined to lose a reputation for workload inefficiency, and the virtualisation story makes for great motherhood and apple crumble stuff, but would it hurt the firm to at least mention green issues in the efficiency context? A day and a half and the only conversation about greening was at the dinner table.

A couple of questions then absolutely floored me: “Are Europeans still obsessed with carbon footprints? Why?” As I responded - with oil at nigh on $100 a barrel, we’re all green now. Simple but brutal economics is now the green advocate’s best friend. It seems totally absurd to me that some people, notably in central governments, are still arguing that efficiency initiatives might “hurt the economy”. Can you imagine a CEO arguing it makes no business sense to become more efficient? Well actually yes but that’s autistic cost-benefit analysis for you.

Microsoft likes to see itself, somewhat justifiably, as taking a long term view on things. Its technical marketing people take evident pride in eschewing what they see as the “latest fads”. Service oriented architecture (SOA) is a good example of same. While other vendors, most notably IBM, were developing the market Microsoft sat on the sidelines looking grumpy, saying ‘there is no such thing as SOA”. Three years later or so and it finally jumps on the bandwagon. For Microsoft though, virtualisation is not a fad but The Real Deal.

And yet… shouldn’t a company that prides itself on the long view be more, rather than less, obsessed with carbon emissions,efficiency and maybe even the future of the planet? Virtualisation and greener data centers make great bed-fellows, as vendors such as Cassatt are doing a great job of articulating, and with that in mind some opportunistic marketing and development would make sense. Microsoft should go and talk to US energy and utility companies and ask about bills and rebates for customers that run more effective IT operations. It could startwith PG&E, which actively recommends customers virtualise their data centers through rebates and a campaign called wecandothis.

One of the refreshing things about Microsoft is the dorkness of much of its market conversation. It tends to avoid the kind of business process hand-waving most major vendors prefer. At Microsoft there is a genuine belief that if you provide great tools to technical people they can do great work. Their pitch is to practitioners rather than CIOs. In my experience though practitioners are just as worried about the future of the planet as any of their their pointy-haired bosses, if not more so. It would be fantastic to see Microsoft marketing green from the roots up.

I don’t see Microsoft leading the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and related green debates. its about time it did. We need a better plan A because there is no plan B.

picture of construction work at Gaudi’s masterpiece La Sagrada Familia courtesy of Mishkabear. Thanks!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!